For broker-backed operators

When a prop arm
bolts onto a brokerage.

Running a regulated broker is hard enough. Running a prop firm next to one, sharing liquidity, separating entities, keeping regulators happy, is a different animal. Our platform is designed for that complexity.

Dual-entity
Architecture
A-book / B-book
Routing-aware
Regulator-ready
Reporting
DUAL-ENTITY ARCHITECTURE
BROKER ENTITY
Regulated Brokerage
Live clients Β· Real capital Β· Regulated jurisdiction
PROP ENTITY
Prop Trading Arm
Challenges Β· Evaluations Β· Firm capital
UNIFIED VIEW
YourPropFirm Ops Console
Unique to this model

Why generic prop tools break when a broker is in the mix

The prop firms that live next to a brokerage have problems that pure-play props don't, and that pure-play prop tools don't solve.

Your entities can't be entangled

Prop capital and broker client capital must be walled off. Regulators will ask. Your CRM should make this trivial, not require a consultant.

Liquidity routing gets complex

Funded accounts may route internally, evaluations through a liquidity provider, demo traffic mocked. Policy per-challenge, not per-firm.

Your broker CRM doesn't do prop

You already have a broker stack. Bolting 'prop' on with workarounds creates two sources of truth, and one of them is always wrong.

Reporting has to reconcile

Finance needs one number per entity. Compliance needs segregated reports. Execs need a unified view. Today it's three spreadsheets.

Compliance is watching

KYC, AML, sanctions, the prop side can't be lax just because 'it's a challenge'. You need real controls, not checkboxes.

Shared identity, different products

A broker client wants to try a challenge. They shouldn't re-onboard. Your stack should know them across both entities.

Purpose-built for dual-entity operators

Hybrid prop-broker infrastructure, without the workarounds.

Everything below assumes you have a regulated broker on one side. Not an afterthought, not a plug-in, the platform is designed for this shape of business.

Entity-aware architecture

Separate ledgers, separate KYC profiles, separate reporting, with a unified identity layer on top. Walls where regulators want them, none where ops doesn't.

Liquidity-aware execution

Per-challenge routing policy: A-book for funded, B-book for evaluations, demo-only for phase one. Switch policies in seconds, audit trail forever.

Broker CRM coexistence

Native adapters for the broker CRMs you already use. Prop lives as a separate surface; data flows where it needs to without duplication.

Consolidated reporting

A single console that reports per-entity and cross-entity. Feeds your BI tool, your auditor, and your regulator, in the format each one wants.

Shared-identity onboarding

A broker client can enter the prop flow without re-KYC. A prop trader can convert to a live broker account without starting over.

Regulator-grade audit trails

Every change, rule edits, payouts, manual overrides, logged with actor, timestamp, and rationale. Export on request.

How integration goes

10-week integration. Live broker stays live throughout.

We don't ask you to pause your broker business. Prop launches on a parallel track with shared identity, then flips live.

1
Weeks 1–2

Entity design

Map your legal structure to platform entities. Decide ledger walls, shared identity, reporting boundaries with compliance in the room.

2
Weeks 3–5

Integration build

Native adapters to your broker CRM, liquidity provider, and PSP. Data flow dry-run against staging.

3
Weeks 6–8

Compliance & risk

Configure per-entity KYC, AML thresholds, risk rules, and reporting exports. Auditor walks the platform.

4
Weeks 9–10

Soft launch

Internal accounts first, then affiliate waitlist, then public. Broker side untouched the entire time.

Total time to live
~10 weeks
Let's talk

A broker adding a prop arm? Let's do it right.

Thirty-minute technical call with a solutions architect who's built this exact shape before. We'll walk through your entity structure and flag the compliance gotchas.